This work was formerly attributed to Franz Liszt (1811-1886), with the catalogue number S.147a
||Imre Mező (1932–)|
Imre Sulyok (1912–2008)
||Neue Liszt-Ausgabe. Serie 2, Band 1 |
Budapest: Editio Musica / Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1990. Plate Z.8766.
||scan: score scanned at 600dpi (High Quality Scanning)|
This "urtext" or "scholarly" (scientific) edition was published at least 25 years ago in the EU (or 20 years ago in Italy, before 1992 in the former USSR). Hence, the edition is public domain in its country of origin or a government publication. Such editions are also public domain in Canada because they fail to meet the minimum 'threshold of originality' to qualify for copyright as an 'adaptation'. They may not be public domain elsewhere. More information about this can be found here.
Please obey the copyright laws of your country. IMSLP does not assume any sort of legal responsibility or liability for the consequences of downloading files that are not in the public domain in your country.
Incorrectly attributed to Franz Liszt
||Variationen über eine Romanze von Méhul
||Variations on a Romance by Méhul
||Mozart, Franz Xaver Wolfgang
|Opus/Catalogue NumberOp./Cat. No.
|Composer Time PeriodComp. Period
"Franz Xaver Mozart's Five Variations on a romance from Méhul's Joseph, Op. 23, was published in 1820. But the work was until 1994 mistakenly attributed to the young: a copyist's manuscript of the work wrongly noted that it was "par le jeune Liszt" ("by the young Liszt"). The work was published in good faith by the Neue Liszt-Ausgabe in 1990 and catalogued as Liszt's S147a. Liszt scholar Leslie Howard recorded the work in similar good faith in 1992 for his series of recordings of the complete music for solo piano by Liszt (for the disc entitled The Young Liszt). But shortly afterwards Howard noted in his sleevenotes for the disc's release: "It has since been established that the attribution is false and that the work is from the pen of Mozart’s son Franz Xaver and was published as his opus 23 in 1820. But since the work remains unknown and unrecorded, like the vast majority of F X Mozart's output, and since the writing is not vastly different from some of the other pieces in this collection, it was thought best not to discard it." — Wikipedia