String Quintet, Op.99 (Mascia, Giuseppe)

Contents

Sheet Music

Parts

PDF scanned by IntCulturale
Generoso (2009/11/4)

PDF scanned by IntCulturale
Generoso (2009/11/4)

PDF scanned by IntCulturale
Generoso (2009/11/4)

PDF scanned by IntCulturale
Generoso (2009/11/4)

PDF scanned by IntCulturale
Generoso (2009/11/4)

Publisher. Info. Manuscript
Copyright
Purchase
Javascript is required for this feature.
PMLP96968-Mascia - Quintet Per 2Violins Viola 2Cellos Op99 manu Violin1.pdf

I. Allegro giusto

PDF typeset by LilyPond 2.15.21
Schissel (2012/1/7)

PDF typeset by LilyPond 2.12.3
Schissel (2011/1/20)

PDF typeset by LilyPond 2.12.3
Schissel (2011/1/20)

PDF typeset by LilyPond 2.12.3
Schissel (2011/1/20)

PDF typeset by LilyPond 2.12.3
Schissel (2011/1/20)

Editor Eric Schissel (*1969)
Publisher. Info. Schissel
Copyright
Misc. Notes (based on Manuscript parts). (initially submitted 2011/1/18, resubmitted 2011/1/20, re-resubmitted beginning 2012/1/7)
Purchase
Javascript is required for this feature.
TNMasciaquintetop99Ipage1.jpg
Javascript is required to submit files.

General Information

Work Title String Quintet
Alternative. Title Quintetto pour [per?] 2 Violini, Viola e 2 Violoncelli, Op.99
Composer Mascia, Giuseppe
Opus/Catalogue NumberOp./Cat. No. Op.99
Key B-flat major
Movements/SectionsMov'ts/Sec's 4 movements
I. Allegro giusto (272 bars)
II. Minuetto
III. Adagio (E major)
IV. Allegro moderato
Year/Date of CompositionY/D of Comp. 1850s-1860s?
Composer Time PeriodComp. Period Romantic
Piece Style Romantic
Instrumentation 2 Violins, Viola, 2 Cellos

Misc. Comments

Date at end of first violin part reads? 18.1.19 (January 18 1819?) No other Mascia works for comparison but seems early to be receiving the opus number 99 - not sure I'm understanding correctly. (Maybe it's the date a library received the manuscript and means January 18 1919- don't know. There are a couple of other notations.) (Schissel)

Amended thought - the quintets opp.100 on were written during the 1860s, suggesting a similar date here. (Schissel) (further amend - lack of bowing, insufficient phrasing odd though, more typical in its way of the 18th or earlier than of the 19th century - was he really a string instrument player? )