I think at this point we might benefit from deciding how to do this. I think it might be best if we have internal links to each copyright case and a page dedicated to them. This way it will not clutter this page with an overbearing amount of information. Another possibility is deleting this page and having the internal links listed on the US copyright page. To be honest, I'm not really sure how many important copyright cases we will gather; it's been a while since I've reviewed any of them. Does anyone think there is a better way? Respectfully, Emery 00:33, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- I think we will benefit from some sort of style guide on this. I will draft one tomorrow evening unless someone has objections. I wonder if this requires some sort of community project as well. There are quite a few cases! I think what separates IMSLP's version of copyright case law is that we will mainly discuss only how it is pertinent to music publications. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to proceed? Respectfully yours, Emery 06:20, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
To be honest, I don't think that there will be enough cases to warrant separate pages for each of them. I agree about style guides for both kinds of pages, though.
Should we move this to US Copyright Law/Cases?-- Snailey (_@/) Talk to Me Email me 02:49, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Perlnerd666. I think there will end up being enough copyright cases to warrant a page for each. I suppose if we limited the information to the most crucial elements we could consolidate all the cases onto one page; however, also keep in mind that there will most likely end up being between 30-50 cases listed. I was actually intending to move it to "Copyright Law Cases" to include cases in all countries, but your suggestion seems more reasonable. To be honest, I haven't given this page much thought after my initial edits. Respectfully, Emery 03:15, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
I will try to finish the copyright cases by the end of September at the latest. Respectfully, Emery 05:30, 21 August 2011 (UTC)