User talk:Matthieu
Free public domain sheet music from IMSLP / Petrucci Music Library
Dear Matthieu,
Welcome to the IMSLP! We would like to thank you for contributing.
Please visit our Contributor Portal to learn more about contributing to IMSLP.
The Tutorial provides you a basic introduction to using this site. If you wish to contribute music scores, you will find all the details in the score submission guide. In case you aren't able to find the answer in those pages, you can leave a note on the forums.
Please consider putting the Babel tags on your user page, to tell others which languages you speak. You can also use the Babel system to find users who speak a certain language.
You can communicate with other users by placing a message on their talk page (click on a user's name, and then on Discussion), just like I did on your page. When logging on the next time, this user will get a notification of a new message. Replying to these messages can be done on your own talk page, or on the corresponding user's talk page. Note that there will be no notification for the other user when replying on your own page. It's always a good idea to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~), which automatically adds your user name and a datestamp.
If you want to discuss something with the whole community, you can post a message in the IMSLP forums. For very important messages, please contact the staff directly via the IMSLP staff contact list.
Frequently asked questions can be found on the FAQ page.
We're looking forward to your next submission!
Regards, Peter talk 16:59, 22 July 2007 (EDT)Rakastava
Hi Matthieu. Sorry if my message was brutal, I want to thank you for the nice orchestral material but indeed I saw many errors when comparing with the original score, and my wish is just that this wonderful music should be spread around the world with some exactitude. Thank you to correct. Here are the errors that I saw:
First Violin (noted 'Volini') I.22 'ten' is unseen I.41 div is missing, the first b is natural, the second flat I.45 one horizontal bar to much on the 3rd note in the triplet I.46 div. is missing II.1 - - - upon the notes III.4 dolce is missing III.5 ' is missing as well as in measures 6, 9, 18, 22 & 23 III.24 - on the E III.32 flat before the B would be abvisable III.44 ' before the Vivace is too little III.49 fermata is marked 'longa' III.90 decrescendo is missing III.114 b is marked ten.
Second Violin I.32 C instead of F I.41 & 46 div. I.45 one horizontal bar to much on the 3rd note in the triplet II.1 - - - under the notes II.19 > at wrong place II.22 > are lacking II.41 > at wrong place II.45 > missing on 2nd note II.84-85 high b's and low b's are inverted III.42 second note should be G# III.44 ' before vivace is too little III.49 fermata is marked 'longa' III.54-58 ties are missing between C's III.90 decrescendo is missing
Violas I.42 the notes should appear on the 1st staff I.45 one horizontal bar to much on the 3rd note in the triplets, the same at I.50 II.8 più missing on 2nd staff II.70-71 check! III.27 there is no tie from the preceding bar, have a check III.28 p is missing III.42 E is flat III.44 ' before vivace III.49 fermata is marked 'longa'
Cellos I.44-46 The notes should appear on both staves I.45 one horizontal bar to much on the 3rd note in the triplets, the same at I.50 I.47 The notes are on the wrong staff I.55-56 check! not the same music than on the score I.58 decrescendo is missing II.62 pizz is lacking II.70-72 notes are 1 octave to low III.24 wrong rhythm, check! III.41-44 Notes should appear on both staves III.42 wrong music, check! III.49 fermata is marked 'longa' III.62 f is missing III.76 espr. is missing
Basses I.45 no bars on the triplets for the basses I.50 ties are missing after 2 last D's I.58 decrescendo is missing III.24 wrong rhythm III.41 rhythm equation is misplaced III.58 ppp is missing III.64 - on G III.78 div. is missing III.90-93 B flat instead of D
%!IFLANG!%(~!en):
Dear Matthieu,
Thank you for your submission. The upload was successful, but you did not provide enough source and publisher information. Can we kindly ask you to fill in as much information as possible? Correct identification of a score is absolutely needed to make sure a score is in public domain and does not violate copyright laws. Also, this identification reflects IMSLP's strive to quality and completeness.
Please pay attention to the following items:
- Scanner:This field should include the name of the scanner, or the website where the file was obtained.
- Editor: The person who edited the score. This is not always known, usually the editor is printed on top of the first page (e.g. edited by... ; in french revue par... or éditée par...; in German bearbeitet von...). This field can concern the original editor, and in case of a typesetted score, the typesetter.
- Publisher Information: You can find publisher information usually on the bottom of the first pages of the score. The format for this field is as follows: "<Place>: <Publisher Company>, No. <Publisher's publication number>, <Date>. Plate <Plate number>."
More fields are described in the Score submission guide.
You will find a lot of information on the first pages of the score. If you have problems gaining information, more tips and help are provided at IMSLP:Contributing scores and Historical Publication Info. An example of a good submission is Frühlingsrauschen (Sinding, Christian)
(~!el):
Αγαπητέ Matthieu,
Ευχαριστούμε για την υποβολή σας. Το ανέβασμα των αρχείων ήταν επιτυχές, αλλά δεν παρέχονται αρκετές πληροφορίες σχετικά με την πηγή και την έκδοση του αρχείου. Σας ζητάμε, λοιπόν, να συμπληρώσετε όσο το δυνατόν περισοτερες πληροφορίες γίνεται σχετικά με την έκδοση του αρχείου, γιατί η σωστή αναγνώριση μιας παρτιτούρας είναι απαραίτητη για να σιγουρευτούμε ότι ένα αρχείο ανήκει στον δημόσιο τομέα και ότι δεν παραβιάζει νόμους περι πνευματικών δικαιωμάτων. Επίσης, αυτή η αναγνώριση αντικατοπτρίζει την προσπάθεια του IMSLP στο να κατέχει ένα συγκεκριμένο επίπεδο ποιότητας και ολοκλήρωσης.
Παρακαλούμε να δώσετε προσοχή στα παρακάτω πεδία:
- Σαρωτής: Αυτό το πεδίο θα πρέπει να περιέχει το όνομα του ατόμου που έκανε τη σάρωση του αρχείου, ή την ιστοσελίδα από την οποία αποκτήθηκε το αρχείο.
- Επιμελητής: Το άτομο που επεξεργάστηκε/επιμελήθηκε της παρτιτούρας. Δεν είναι πάντα γνωστό, αν και συνήθως οι επιμελητές αναγράφονται στην κορυφή της πρώτης σελίδας (π.χ. στα Αγγλικά edited by... ; στα Γαλλικά revue par... ή éditée par...; στα Γερμανικά bearbeitet von... κλπ). Αυτό το πεδίο αφορά τον αυθεντικό επιμελητή, ή στην περίπτωση στοιχειοθετημένων παρτιτούρων, τον στοιχειοθέτη.
- Πληροφορίες Έκδοσης: Πληροφορίες σχετικά με την έκδοση φαίνονται, συνήθως, στο κάτω-κάτω μέρος των πρώτων σελίδων της παρτιτούρας. Η μορφή για αυτό το πεδίο είναι ώς εξής: "<Τόπος>: <Εκδοτικός Οίκος>, No. <Αριθμός έκδοσης >, <Ημερομηνία>. Πλάκα <Αριθμός πλάκας>."
Περισσότερα πεδία περιγράφονται στη σελίδα IMSLP:Οδηγός Υποβολής Παρτιτούρων.
Θα βρείτε πολλές πληροφορίες στις πρώτες σελίδες της παρτιτούρας. Αν έχετε προβλήματα με την εύρεση πληροφοριών, μπορείτε να βρείτε βοήθεια στις σελίδες IMSLP:Συνεισφέροντας Παρτιτούρες και Ιστορικές Πληροφορίες Δημοσιεύσεων. Ένα παράδειγμα μιας καλής υποβολής είναι στη σελίδα Frühlingsrauschen (Sinding, Christian)
%!ENDIFLANG!%
Congratulations
with your copyright reviewer status. I'm together with Carolus a supervisor for the reviewers, so you can ask me anything. There's also a special page for reviewers: IMSLP:Copyright Reviewers. Cheers, Peter talk 16:30, 30 September 2007 (EDT).
Re: Copyright review criterions for living composers
Hi. For new composers, I always ask on the talk page of the submitter whether they are the composer. Usually, for some reason, most people don't manage to answer this simple question, or they don't know how to reply. If they are the composer, they must put this on their user page. I also ask if they are sure that the license on IMSLP is the one they want, especially in the case they entered public domain as license. And indeed, it is on my mind for a long time that all these composers should better make mention of the license in the pdf itself instead of leaving no traces on their scores, but I must admit I haven't managed to systematically ask this or the make this into guideline. Cheers --Peter talk 14:39, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
Copyright Reviewing
Hi Matthieu! Good work on the copyright reviewing! I just wanted to drop by and say that you don't have to put tags on pages if the autotagger already tagged that page with the correct overall tag (like the non-pd-EU tag for the Juon pieces). The file tags are only for when the file in question has a different status from the work itself. In 90+% of the case the work page autotagger should have done all the tagging needed, since it will tag accurately as long as composer dates and date of publication is given :) The use of file tags are usually because of the editor. --Feldmahler 02:27, 10 October 2007 (EDT)
Es_ist_ein_Ros'_entsprungen_(Praetorius,_Michael)
Matthieu - I see you temporarily blocked the Es ist ein Ros' score. When you look at the score you will see that the typesetter expressly gives Praetorius the credit for the arrangement. In that case, can any copyright be claimed? --Df 14:38, 17 July 2008 (EDT)
Reactivation of the NMA project
Hi Matthieu,
after a long period of negligible IMSLP activity, I am hoping to reactivate the NMA incorporation project. As you were the only other active project member before the closure of IMSLP last year, could I ask you to:
1) update the project page with any of the volumes you've obtained since last year. I've been too busy in real life to have acquired any more, however I am going to start work on obtaining Series II (vol 25 Zaïde) and Series X, (vol 102-105, 4 Handel arrangements);
2) make a posting over at the forum thread asking for volunteers - especially, to help keep it at the top of the thread list (don't bother posting now, it's already at the top :)
3) had you heard of anyone else wishing to help out with the project? Vivaldi seemed keen.
Have a read of the new material I've posted in both places; although we can host at least 30 volumes without any conceivable ramifications at all, the objective is to seek permission for the "whole box and dice" i.e. all 100+ volumes.
Regards, Philip Legge ♇ @ © talk 18:04, 30 October 2008 (EDT)
Bolognani editions
Hi Matthieu, Do you happen to know if Mr. Bolognani gave his approval for the posting of his typesets here? I seem to recall that he for some reason was not wanting his items here, but this goes back before the great shut-down, so my memory could be faulty here. I know his site states he uses the CC licenses, but we normally will not post new typesets if the typesetter objects. Thanks, Carolus 02:27, 8 January 2009 (EST)
Pages traduites à insérer
Bonjour,
J'ai traduit plusieurs pages en français :
- Help:Tutoriel (==>Help:Tutorial) ;
- Help:Tutoriel/TdM (==>Help:Tutorial/TOC) ;
- Help:Tutoriel/Le wiki (==>Help:Tutorial/The wiki) ;
- Help:Tutoriel/Pages de discussion (==>Help:Tutorial/Talk pages) ;
- Help:Tutoriel/Modifier une page (==>Help:Tutorial/Page editing) ;
- Help:Suppression d'une page (==>Help:Page deletion).
Je me demande comment les intégrer dans IMSLP pour qu'elles deviennent visibles aux lecteurs français.
Je prévois également traduire Help:Page editing.
Sherbrooke 05:48, 18 January 2009 (EST)
Internationalization
Hello Matthieu, I have set up a separate page to coordinate the translation to French: IMSLP:Internationalization/Français. Feel free to adapt the page to your needs. You can also compare with the Spanish page to see how it is organized: IMSLP:Equipo de traducción al español. Thank you very much for your efforts. --Leonard Vertighel 07:44, 23 January 2009 (EST)
Mozart's Divertimento K.136
Hi,
Thanks for uploading this divertimento - I'm playing from the parts in a gig this afternoon! Two notes though. Firstly, I think the titles are wrong: the parts say K.138, which is the one in F-major and this is most definitely in D-major!
Secondly, I noticed a slight typo in the (hard!) semiquaver runs in the vln 2 part: in bar 59, I think the first two notes should be e,d rather than the other way around (unless I've just been playing it wrong for the last few years!). There may be more mistakes, but that's the one I noticed in the part I'm playing!
Did you typeset this? If so, are there .ly files available somewhere? I'd be happy to fix the typos myself. And also, if that is the case, is there a protocol for uploading "fixed" versions on IMSLP?
Anyway, thanks again for the resource!
Rupert
Hi Rupert. Thanks you for message. I fixed the typo you mentionned as well as several other mistakes (including an annoying page turn in the Andante in the violin I part). New material is ready for download now. I prepared this typeset for a project with my orchestra that we finally cancelled.
As a consequence it has never been proof-read during rehersals. That's why I suspect there might be some other typos. So, if you or your colleagues have noticed other problems with this edition, please feel free to list them and I'll be glad to fix it in due course. Last thing: the source is Sibelius (commercial soft), not lylipond. Cheers, --Matthieu 08:27, 3 April 2009 (EDT)
Magnard/Ropartz
Just as a note on your wishlist additions, it is my goal to have the complete collections of both Magnard and Ropartz up this year (in addition to my on-going Saint-Saens collection). So it may take some time :) Daphnis 11:01, 30 April 2009 (EDT)
American Composers - EU status
Hello Matthieu, When you run into a public domain work of an American composer like Harvey Gaul which was published before 1923 by an American publisher, it is probably public domain in the EU as well due to the EU's application of Rule of the Shorter Term. You'll have to use the <!--noautotag--> on those pages along with tagging them "C" for EU copyright status. Thanks, Carolus 14:15, 18 June 2009 (EDT)
Purcell
Just a quick thanks for the typeset of the Pavane and Chacony, really great work.-- Snailey Talk to Me Email me 02:38, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Tagger
Hi - sorry for stepping on your toes a few times with the tagging just now. Are you getting the same screen I am? I see 1-1-1 in the "unknown" row, but there aren't any unknowns left. Strange...-- Snailey Talk to Me Email me 16:57, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi ! No problem for the simultaneous tagging ! But, no I don't see this 1-1-1 in the unkwon row. From what page did you get thiw strange message ?--Matthieu 17:00, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Lekeu Adagio
Matthieu, Bravo, your typeset looks beautiful, well-considered and executed on many levels. Thanks for letting the world benefit from your hard work. Congratulations and mille grazie! Daphnis 13:55, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Daphnis, and thanks for your kind message. By the way, thank you too for posting Ropartz's first symphony. Lekeu's adagio was more time consuming than I imagined at the beginning. In fact I started this project just after you posted the original edition. Since I uploaded it, I noticed that some bar numbers are missing. This is a problem with mixing postscript and truetype fonts. It is now fixed (using only postscript fonts). But still, I will upload the corrected version tomorrow because we have our first rehearsal tonight with this typeset and I'm almost sure some typos will emerge...--Matthieu 14:43, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
That seems to be the best way to route out those pesky typos. Wishing you luck, Daphnis 14:52, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
