IMSLP - User contributions [en]

User talk:Nevilley

2012-01-20T11:43:13Z

Nevilley: Anti-redlink edit! :)

Again, I do not wish to be at home to Mr Redlink. Sadly I have nothing much to say here currently, though. [[User:Nevilley|Nevilley]] 11:43, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Nevilley

2012-01-20T11:42:03Z

Nevilley: Created page with 'I just hated the redlink. It would be even better if I had something to say, though ...'

I just hated the redlink. It would be even better if I had something to say, though ...

User talk:KGill

2012-01-20T11:41:03Z

Nevilley: /* Te Deum in D major, HWV 278 (Handel, George Frideric) */ yes thanks

{| align="right" style="text-align: left; border: solid 1px #CCC; margin: 10px; padding: 5px;"
|style="border-top-color: rgb(211, 211, 211); border-right-color: rgb(211, 211, 211); border-bottom-color: rgb(211, 211, 211); border-left-color: rgb(211, 211, 211); border-top-width: 1px; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-left-width: 1px; border-top-style: dotted; border-right-style: dotted; border-bottom-style: dotted; border-left-style: dotted; "|<center>[[Image:Filing Cabinent.png|100px]]</center>
|-
|style="border-top-color: rgb(211, 211, 211); border-right-color: rgb(211, 211, 211); border-bottom-color: rgb(211, 211, 211); border-left-color: rgb(211, 211, 211); border-top-width: 1px; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-left-width: 1px; border-top-style: dotted; border-right-style: dotted; border-bottom-style: dotted; border-left-style: dotted; "|
*[[User talk:KGill/archive1|22 June, 2009 - 8 December, 2009]]
*[[User talk:KGill/archive2|13 December, 2009 - 30 March, 2010]]
*[[User talk:KGill/archive3|1 April, 2010 - 31 May, 2010]]
*[[User talk:KGill/archive4|1 June, 2010 - 7 July, 2010]]
*[[User talk:KGill/archive5|13 July, 2010 - 20 August, 2010]]
*[[User talk:KGill/archive6|21 August, 2010 - 5 October, 2010]]
*[[User talk:KGill/archive7|9 October, 2010 - 28 November, 2010]]
*[[User talk:KGill/archive8|4 December, 2010 - 2 January, 2011]]
*[[User talk:KGill/archive9|3 January, 2011 - 20 January, 2011]]
*[[User talk:KGill/archive10|23 January, 2011 - 23 February, 2011]]
*[[User talk:KGill/archive11|1 March, 2011 - 9 April, 2011]]
*[[User talk:KGill/archive12|10 April, 2011 - 12 April, 2011]]
*[[User talk:KGill/archive13|13 April, 2011 - 8 June, 2011]]
*[[User talk:KGill/archive14|13 June, 2011 - 17 July, 2011]]
*[[User talk:KGill/archive15|18 July, 2011 - 13 August, 2011]]
*[[User talk:KGill/archive16|15 August, 2011 - 5 November 2011]]
|}

== Bassano, Giovanni vs. Augustine ==

Would you please reinstate the composer page for Augustine Bassano and transfer the Gagliard edited by Peter Philips from the Giovanni page to the Augustine page. The pdf files themselves have the correct composer. I would do the transfer but I am unsure of any linkages involved. I will then add the other Augustine Bassano pieces to this new composer page. I hope we have this all straightened out then. If you cannot do this, can some other moderator do it? Thanks. [[User:Afolop|Afolop]] 09:27, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
:Done: {{cat|Bassano, Augustine}}. Cheers, [[User:KGill|KGill]] [[User Talk:KGill|talk]] [[Special:Emailuser/KGill|email]] 17:20, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

== [[IMSLP:Copyright Information Project/CanadaDraft|Canada Draft]] ==

Hi KGill. I just want to let you know that I think the draft for page about Canadian copyright law is finished. Do you think it looks OK? I'm sorry I couldn't finish it sooner, my health got in the way of me being able to do almost anything. Your comments are appreciated very much. Respectfully yours, [[User:Emery|Emery]] 19:56, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
:Emery, the page looks absolutely fantastic. Unfortunately I don't really have time to read it in any great detail at the moment, but I will definitely try to sometime during the next week. In any case, judging from the glance I took at it, it is highly detailed and informative - an excellent complement to the US page. I'm sorry I cannot offer a more useful review at present, but then again your knowledge of the subject far exceeds my own. Cheers, [[User:KGill|KGill]] [[User Talk:KGill|talk]] [[Special:Emailuser/KGill|email]] 20:57, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi! Emery, your page look really nice. I wish I had some criticism but I don't... It looks really well fleshed out! I'm just wondering, do you have a law degree? You seem to know a lot of legislation and such. If not, what type of degree do you have? Music? I'm just wondering because I'm not sure what is involved in having your type of job. Cheers! [[User:Lndlewis10|Lndlewis10]] 21:38, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
:Hi Lndlewis10. I'm glad you like the page, but there are some things that could definitely be improved. If memory serves, I don't think a law degree is required to work on the copyright office. I guess I do technically do have a degree in musicology, but I really don't remember too much about it anymore. My dissertation involved some details on publishing and copyright, which is how I picked up interest and maybe a little bit of knowledge on copyright law. I really don't know too much about it though, I've lost touch with that type of research. I worked in my local library for some time, and eventually ended up in the copyright office by a curious turn of events. I'm on a leave of absence right now due to my condition, but that gives me more time to do some personal research into the musical fields that interest me most. Respectfully yours, [[User:Emery|Emery]] 22:08, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

== Te Deum in D major, HWV 278 (Handel, George Frideric) ==

Hi. Sorry to bother you but I wondered - as you've been involved before - could you please very kindly take a look at [[Talk:Te Deum in D major, HWV 278 (Handel, George Frideric)]] where I am rabbiting on about ... stuff. I would attempt to sort it out myself but my cluelessness could be an issue ... Thanks and best wishes [[User:Nevilley|Nevilley]] 14:49, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
:Hi, sorry for the delayed response. I've tried to address the issue now (posted on the talk page) - hopefully it's OK now. Cheers, [[User:KGill|KGill]] [[User Talk:KGill|talk]] [[Special:Emailuser/KGill|email]] 17:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
::Sorry for my ''even more delayed'' response and thanks, yes, I do believe that it's OK now! Best wishes [[User:Nevilley|Nevilley]] 11:41, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Te Deum in D major, HWV 278 (Handel, George Frideric)

2012-01-20T11:39:57Z

Nevilley: /* "Complete" score - is it really? */ Thanks!

==Probably should be HWV 278==
I don't think that this is HWV 280. Instead, I think it should be HWV 278 (the "Utrecht" Te Deum), and is paired with [[Jubilate in D major, HWV 279 (Handel, George Frideric)]]. 
HWV 280 is the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_compositions_by_George_Frideric_Handel#Canticles "Queen Caroline" Te Deum] (composed a year after the HWV 278, HWV 279 pair). 
[[User:GFHandel|GFHandel]] 02:02, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
:Moved. Didn't see this until now, sorry. [[User:KGill|KGill]] [[User Talk:KGill|talk]] [[Special:Emailuser/KGill|email]] 03:11, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

== "Complete" score - is it really? ==

Hi. I am new here so apologies if I'm missing the point or something ... please feel free to advise. What it looks like to me is that the file under "Complete Score" is actually the ''Jubilate'', not the ''Te Deum.'' I base this observation on the fact the the table of contents in the score shows the ''Te Deum'' starting on p. 2 and the ''Jubilate'' on p. 46; the PDF contains only pp 46-87 from the score; the music presented therein is consistent with the ToC. I think, therefore, that the ''Te Deum'' itself is absent. Or am I just confused or wrong? Thanks and best wishes [[User:Nevilley|Nevilley]] 14:22, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
:Oops - it's slightly worse than that. The real score for the Te Deum is [http://imslp.org/index.php?title=Jubilate_in_D_major,_HWV_279_%28Handel,_George_Frideric%29&oldid=540437 here at an old version of the Jubilate page] now redirected to this (Te Deum) page. So they were backwards at some point but now redirected so that the Te Deum has kind-of vanished. I think I see what needs done, but I have no idea how to do it. The main requirement is that whoever does do it looks at ''the actual score music pages,'' not just at the title page. If the music starts on the printed p2 then it's the Te Deum; if on the printed p. 46 then it's the Jubilate. (And yeah, sorry, my ''italics for titles'' didn't survive too long ...) Best wishes [[User:Nevilley|Nevilley]] 14:28, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
::I've now [[Jubilate in D major, HWV 279 (Handel, George Frideric)|restored]] the old Jubilate page and switched the two files - is that adequate? Thanks, [[User:KGill|KGill]] [[User Talk:KGill|talk]] [[Special:Emailuser/KGill|email]] 17:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
:::Apologies for the slow response and yes, thank you, it is. At least to my inexpert eye and limited comprehension, that seems to be precisely what was required. Thanks and best wishes, [[User:Nevilley|Nevilley]] 11:39, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

User talk:KGill

2012-01-06T14:49:17Z

Nevilley: /* Te Deum in D major, HWV 278 (Handel, George Frideric) */ new section

Talk:Te Deum in D major, HWV 278 (Handel, George Frideric)

2012-01-06T14:46:03Z

Nevilley: /* "Complete" score - is it really? */ further clarification. I should probably stop now...

Talk:Te Deum in D major, HWV 278 (Handel, George Frideric)

2012-01-06T14:30:12Z

Nevilley: /* "Complete" score - is it really? */ sp and clarify

==Probably should be HWV 278==
I don't think that this is HWV 280. Instead, I think it should be HWV 278 (the "Utrecht" Te Deum), and is paired with [[Jubilate in D major, HWV 279 (Handel, George Frideric)]]. 
HWV 280 is the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_compositions_by_George_Frideric_Handel#Canticles "Queen Caroline" Te Deum] (composed a year after the HWV 278, HWV 279 pair). 
[[User:GFHandel|GFHandel]] 02:02, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
:Moved. Didn't see this until now, sorry. [[User:KGill|KGill]] [[User Talk:KGill|talk]] [[Special:Emailuser/KGill|email]] 03:11, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

== "Complete" score - is it really? ==

Hi. I am new here so apologies if I'm missing the point or something ... please feel free to advise. What it looks like to me is that the file under "Complete Score" is actually the ''Jubilate'', not the ''Te Deum.'' I base this observation on the fact the the table of contents in the score shows the ''Te Deum'' starting on p. 2 and the ''Jubilate'' on p. 46; the PDF contains only pp 46-87 from the score; the music presented therein is consistent with the ToC. I think, therefore, that the ''Te Deum'' itself is absent. Or am I just confused or wrong? Thanks and best wishes [[User:Nevilley|Nevilley]] 14:22, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
:Oops - it's slightly worse than that. The real score for the Te Deum is [http://imslp.org/index.php?title=Jubilate_in_D_major,_HWV_279_%28Handel,_George_Frideric%29&oldid=540437 here at an old version of the Jubilate page] now redirected to this (Te Deum) page. So they were backwards at some point but now redirected so that the Te Deum has kind-of vanished. I think I see what needs done, but I have no idea how to do it. The main requirement is that whoever does do it looks at ''the actual score music pages,'' not just at the title page. If the music starts on p2 then it's the Te Deum; if p. 46 then it's the Jubilate. (And yeah, sorry, my ''italics for titles'' didn't survive too long ...) Best wishes [[User:Nevilley|Nevilley]] 14:28, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Te Deum in D major, HWV 278 (Handel, George Frideric)

2012-01-06T14:28:41Z

Nevilley: /* "Complete" score - is it really? */ update - oops

==Probably should be HWV 278==
I don't think that this is HWV 280. Instead, I think it should be HWV 278 (the "Utrecht" Te Deum), and is paired with [[Jubilate in D major, HWV 279 (Handel, George Frideric)]]. 
HWV 280 is the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_compositions_by_George_Frideric_Handel#Canticles "Queen Caroline" Te Deum] (composed a year after the HWV 278, HWV 279 pair). 
[[User:GFHandel|GFHandel]] 02:02, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
:Moved. Didn't see this until now, sorry. [[User:KGill|KGill]] [[User Talk:KGill|talk]] [[Special:Emailuser/KGill|email]] 03:11, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

== "Complete" score - is it really? ==

Hi. I am new here so apologies if I'm missing the point or something ... please feel free to advise. What it looks like to me is that the file under "Complete Score" is actually the ''Jubilate'', not the ''Te Deum.'' I base this observation on the fact the the table of contents in the score shows the ''Te Deum'' starting on p. 2 and the ''Jubilate'' on p. 46; the PDF contains only pp 46-87 from the score; the music presented therein is consistent with the ToC. I think, therefore, that the ''Te Deum'' itself is absent. Or am I just confused or wrong? Thanks and best wishes [[User:Nevilley|Nevilley]] 14:22, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
:Oops - it's slightly worse than that. The real score for the Te Deum is [http://imslp.org/index.php?title=Jubilate_in_D_major,_HWV_279_%28Handel,_George_Frideric%29&oldid=540437 here at an old version of the Jubilate page] now redirected to this (Te Deum) page. So they were backwards at some point but now redirected so that the Te Deum has kind-of vanished. I think I see hat needs done, but I have no idea how to do it. The main requirement is that whoever does do it looks at the actual score, not just at the title page. If the music starts on p2 then it's the Te Deum; if p. 46 then it's the Jubilate. (yeah, sorry, my ''italics'' didn't survive too long ...) Best wishes [[User:Nevilley|Nevilley]] 14:28, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Te Deum in D major, HWV 278 (Handel, George Frideric)

2012-01-06T14:22:52Z

Nevilley: /* "Complete" score - is it really? */ new section