Search results

  • :Thanks for archiving this page by the way! I haven't had the time :) --[[User:Funper|Funper]] 13:15, 25 May 2 ...ually Liszt's edititorial works are much like transcriptions. You will see by comparing them both that the ossia in Liszt's edition is quite different fr
    27 KB (4,410 words) - 01:22, 30 June 2010
  • ...actice parts of the aforementioned piece, since my online order only had a score; and when I went to check the practice parts, they were of Trio no 1 op 49! ...ove page to another page. It is good to have no redundant work pages, but by redirecting you removed all content. The content was a broken file entry,
    256 KB (40,021 words) - 23:18, 16 July 2019
  • Hello Matthias, just leaving a note that I'm really impressed by your scans. Impressing how crisp but smooth the details can be even in mon ...Hope this will help others for better results. There are so many fantastic scores around here, but it's not so easy to use them for playing.
    50 KB (8,289 words) - 12:32, 28 April 2011
  • ...hat's why they had the S. #### plate numbers, which was not a pattern used by Schirmer, which was also not up to the 7000s back in the early 1880s. I've ... whether or not a work was part of a larger set, and whether or not it was published with an opus. I'll follow your formatting from this point forward. Thanks.
    85 KB (14,276 words) - 00:21, 18 August 2011

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)