Looking at the RISM entries, there seems to be quite a bit of the typical 18th-century publisher incoherence and chaos over opus numbers. It also gets to be a game of "who was first" - I suspect our Op.22 and 21 are the same thing from the RISM entries, but they've been known to drop the ball themselves now and again also. Has anyone sorted it out? I'll put in links to the things we have at RISM where possible so we can eventually put things where they belong....
| Posted at 20:48, 26 February 2017 by Carolus (administrator) |
|