| Ok, sk,... ⟨Muzgiz⟩ |
[#7786] |
- ) Fair enough- I was confused by the "s...k" in library catalog plate descriptions and wondered if we lacked a plate table for them. Maybe all that "lacked" was a line of explanation to that effect here about the transliteration- but if perhaps only I would have been confused by such things, I'm sure there's no need for that either!... Thanks, anycase cleared up for me now - ES
| Posted at 13:12, 3 August 2014 by Schissel (administrator) |
|
No problem. Just those pesky libraries leading us astray again :-)
| Posted at 05:29, 4 August 2014 by P.davydov (administrator) |
| Re "c..k" vs. "s...k": I'm no longer nearly so convinced it's a matter of a mistake in transliteration, and seriously suggest separation of tables unless some alternate suggestion can be made for the fact that there are even double assignments of plates, one for c 2447 k, one for s 2247 k, published years apart, e.g., and separate but more or less consistent streams that would basically be more or less chronological (up to the 1980s? 1990s? 2000? or so) if the tables -were- separated (until the 1990s... there seems to be yet a third plate stream where the numbers restart, with publications in 2004 e.g. having very low plates again but again c...k (though here the publisher name is slightly different, I think, fitting the new political environment I suppose...- well, publishing is complicated. Anyway and back to the point, I do suggest separating the plates, as we do at the top, to make such chronological order as exists most readily visible and allow better prediction of plate-date pairs, etc. ...)
| Posted at 22:27, 16 December 2014 by Schissel (administrator) |
| Remember there's no letter "s" in the Russian alphabet. So if "s" really does appear in the plate number on the score (and isn't a transliteration), then it's highly unlikely to be a Muzgiz issue.
| Posted at 09:33, 18 December 2014 by P.davydov (administrator) |
| I'm guessing the s is a transliteration... the only score in the "s...k" series I have access to "just right now" is the Prokofiev ballade we have uploaded (well, it's PD-CA-only I think, but...) - oh. No, the Prokofiev Ballade really is a c 1814 k. Ah. So if something's different that explains the 1960/1970s etc., it's -not- the plate (hrm...), assuming the others are similar. I withdraw my objection...
The new post-2004 "Sov. kompozitor" stuff is still sort of interesting (libraries list this as an alternate name for the Sankt Petersburg publisher of e.g. the (Sergei Slonimskii*) works published by Iz. K. that I've put in the table, but which probably belong in another table or another page.
*Yeah, might be related to Nicolas Slonimskii the author, I forget... Sergei Slonimskii's music (concertos, sonatas, operas, etc., at least 30 symphonies, one of them - the Lyrical- has a 2nd subtitle, In Memoriam Nikolai Myaskovskii) -- looks interesting or at least Symphony 11 does so far, will borrow and listen (@YouTube) to more etc. First heard of him in a review of a piano sonata of his - coupled with a sonata by Tishchenko - written by Paul Rapoport.)
| Posted at 13:23, 18 December 2014 by Schissel (administrator) |
| re s- ah, right, forgot...
| Posted at 11:43, 30 May 2015 by Schissel (administrator) |
| |
