Movements/SectionsMov'ts/Sec's | 4 movements |
---|---|
Composition Year | 1909-15 |
Genre Categories | Sonatas; For piano; Scores featuring the piano; For 1 player |
Contents |
|
1. Emerson (EU)
*#718396 - 20.24MB - 12:19 - -) ( - V/N/V - 68×⇩ - MP3 - Lucas-coelho
MP3 file (audio)
Lucas-coelho (2021/7/22)
2. The Alcotts (EU)
*#718397 - 16.65MB - 9:59 - -) ( - V/N/V - 200×⇩ - MP3 - Lucas-coelho
MP3 file (audio)
Lucas-coelho (2021/7/22)
3. Hawthorne (EU)
*#718398 - 20.18MB - 12:04 - -) ( - V/N/V - 50×⇩ - MP3 - Lucas-coelho
MP3 file (audio)
Lucas-coelho (2021/7/22)
4. Thoreau (EU)
*#718399 - 18.72MB - 12:21 - -) ( - V/N/V - 43×⇩ - MP3 - Lucas-coelho
MP3 file (audio)
Lucas-coelho (2021/7/22)
|
|
|
Complete Score (CA)
*#03928 - 3.91MB, 67 pp. - -) (- V/43/25 - NachoBA
Outer and Inner Covers (CA)
*#658923 - 1.16MB, 12 pp. - -) (- V/43/25 - Jurabe
|
Work Title | Piano Sonata No.2 |
---|---|
Alternative. Title | Concord, Mass., 1840–60 |
Composer | Ives, Charles |
I-Catalogue NumberI-Cat. No. | ICI 6 |
Movements/SectionsMov'ts/Sec's | 4 movements:
|
Year/Date of CompositionY/D of Comp. | 1909-15 |
First Publication. | 1921 |
Copyright Information | Possibly public domain in EU and elsewhere. Note that in some cases this rule may be overridden by a treaty with the source country (especially the United States) and/or may not apply to works which fell into the public domain in their source country due to a failure to renew copyright or comply with other formalities. |
Composer Time PeriodComp. Period | Early 20th century |
Piece Style | Early 20th century |
Instrumentation | piano (with optional viola in the 1st movement and flute in 4th movement) |
External Links | MusicBrainz Wikipedia article |
Although the Concord Sonata was first published by Ives himself in January 1921 (Knickerbocker Press), this is an exceedingly rare score. (One was being offered on Abebooks recently for over $1000 USD.) [Insertion by M.J.E.: See "Discuss this piece" for more on this.] The 1921 score is most likely public domain in the USA, though some legal experts consider it to be a form of "limited publication" - an arcane legal doctrine by which a work can be printed and distributed on a limited basis (to subscribers, for example) and remain unpublished in the legal sense of the term.