These are interesting pieces: broadly in the 19th-century salon style, yet (it seems on brief examination) with more depth and complexity than is usual for this type of piece. It's good to see such things appearing on the site - so thanks.
But just a note to say that, for the third piece, in the newer higher-resolution copy, p. 8 has been accidentally duplicated, while p. 9 is missing altogether. I hope this can be fixed some time. Thanks. M.J.E. 10:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC)