User talk:J.p.m

Copyright Warning
Red copyright.png

Dear J.p.m,
You recently created composer pages for composers that do not seem to be in public domain. IMSLP only accepts works that are not copyrighted. Please visit Public Domain for more information about the public domain. Tips for determining the publication date of your score can be found on IMSLP:Contributing scores.
If your submission was in public domain, please add relevant information about the publication to the file page. Copyrighted files will be deleted.

Thank you!

Sorry. I also love Shostakovich, and the rest, but we cannot accept works by them without permission. -- Snailey Talk to Me Email me 13:23, 9 May 2009 (EDT)

By the way, the saint-saens was fine! Please try to add the puiblisher information yourself if you can. Make sure to read the guide for contributing scores, and other pages linked to the Contributor Portal.-- Snailey Talk to Me Email me 13:26, 9 May 2009 (EDT)
Please, PLEASE, be careful when you submit files to make sure that they are 'Public Domain'! Marius Casadesus is still alive, so his edition is not PD in Canada, the EU and elsewhere. If you continue and do not respond to these messages, we will be forced to ban you from the site. This is NOT personal, but we cannot allow copyrighted materials without the consent and permission of the copyrihgt holder, etc.-- Snailey Talk to Me Email me 15:39, 9 May 2009 (EDT)
Read the Page on Public Domain and understand what it means. If you continue to upload copyrighted files and do not respond, we will be forced to block you. -- Snailey Talk to Me Email me 06:47, 10 May 2009 (EDT)

Please do not continue to create pages for works which we already have! We thank you for the time you took scanning this, but it is useless if it is not submitted using the manual of style found on the score submission guide. If you have any questions, please respond here or by email. We look forward to your response.-- Snailey Talk to Me Email me 07:09, 10 May 2009 (EDT)

For that matter, doing a "hit and run" job of dumping files on the website without any attempt at identifying them isn't exactly helpful either. There are five authentic Mozart violin concertos; then there's the doubtful one in D major which you've identified as “N7” but not given a catalogue number (it is in fact K3 271a = K6 271i, he said pedantically); as for N6 in E, this one has to be spurious - just from the solo part alone it doesn't look like a Mozart concerto, even if so-and-so from the Conservatoire said so. Philip Legge @ © talk 08:45, 10 May 2009 (EDT)
Thanks for your quick email! We would love to help you contribute some of those 5,000 (!) Scores. If you have any questions, or uncertainties, etc. feel free to ask the community on the forums (either the main English forum or the French forum), or contact other users via their user talk pages or email.-- Snailey Talk to Me Email me 09:08, 10 May 2009 (EDT)

Dear J.p.m., To repeat what others have stated above, you really need to become more familiar with what is public domain before uploading things here. The Prokofiev Violin Sonata No.1, Op.80 (also please note how the title is formatted, in contrast to Violin sonate No 1op 80 F min) you uploaded was in an edition by Joseph Szigeti, who died only in 1973 (less than 50 years ago), which means the edition is still protected in Canada. Also, kindly refrain from un-doing my revisions to items, as you did with the Mozart K.285b. The Mozart volume you uplaoded contains three quartets, not just the one. That's why I created the other workpages. Thanks, Carolus 13:48, 16 May 2009 (EDT) (IMSLP Copyright Admin)

Please do not create needless pages. We already have pages for the Beethoven Violin Sonatas. Thanks, Carolus 15:06, 16 May 2009 (EDT) (IMSLP Copyright Admin)

Dear J.p.m,

Thank you for your submission. The upload was successful, but you did not provide enough source and publisher information. Can we kindly ask you to fill in as much information as possible? Correct identification of a score is absolutely needed to make sure a score is in public domain and does not violate copyright laws. Also, this identification reflects IMSLP's strive to quality and completeness.

Please pay attention to the following items:

  • Scanner:This field should include the name of the scanner, or the website where the file was obtained.
  • Editor: The person who edited the score. This is not always known, usually the editor is printed on top of the first page (e.g. edited by... ; in french revue par... or éditée par...; in German bearbeitet von...). This field can concern the original editor, and in case of a typesetted score, the typesetter.
  • Publisher Information: You can find publisher information usually on the bottom of the first pages of the score. The format for this field is as follows: "<Place>: <Publisher Company>, No. <Publisher's publication number>, <Date>. Plate <Plate number>."

More fields are described in the Score submission guide.

You will find a lot of information on the first pages of the score. If you have problems gaining information, more tips and help are provided at IMSLP:Contributing scores and Historical Publication Info. An example of a good submission is Frühlingsrauschen (Sinding, Christian)

Thanks! -- Snailey Talk to Me Email me 19:29, 17 May 2009 (EDT)


Adding new titles

Dear J.p.m. Please check a composer's page before creating needless new pages. For example, we already have a page for the Prokofiev: Violin Sonata No.2, Op.94. We certainly did not need for you to create an additional - superfluous - page for this title. You end up creating a lot of needless work for the admins to clean up, when just paying attention to what is already here would save time. Thanks, 20:48, 21 May 2009 (EDT) (IMSLP Copyright Admin)

I saw your entry but I created a new one for the following reason: Your existing entry is called

   "Violin Sonata No.2, Op.94 (Prokofiev, Sergei)"

But as long as I know, op 94 if not a violin but a flute sonata composed in 1942-43, it's violin adaptation by prokofiev and oistrak was realized in 1944 and is known under op 94 bis

As long as I proposed the flute score, I wasn't OK to put it under violon sonate entry. For that reason I added an enrty 'sonate N2 op 94' without a specific violin reference in the title

In my opinion, your corrections and moved are not yet finished. You still have to rename the title Violin Sonata No.2, Op.94 (Prokofiev, Sergei) to Flute Sonata No.2, Op.94 (Prokofiev, Sergei) and adaptation for violin (op 94bis)

and your title Arrangements and Transcriptions For Flute and Piano have to be swapped to Arrangements and Transcriptions For Violin and Piano (as 94 bis) and attributed to the violin score

OK, Thanks for pointing this out. Since the composer supervised the preparation of the Violin version, it's actually designated as a separate work in the Prokofiev catalogue - Op.94b. Accordingly, we've now moved your Flute part to a new page for Op.94 (the Flute Sonata). We try to follow the catalogs of the various composers whenever possible. This case is a little unusual in that the second version (for violin) is actually better known than the original version (for flute), which is why I made the mistake of thinking the Flute version was the transcription. Your other uploads today were all OK, by the way. The Paganini titles were evidently not renewed in the USA by Zimmermann and have thus entered the public domain there. Please do follow our title format when you add a new work-page. Usually, simply follow the pattern used for other titles in the composer's category-page. Your scans are of very good quality. They also load quickly, even though they are in color. Carolus 01:22, 22 May 2009 (EDT)

Dear Sir,

   I did a small error and I proposed a Goldmark violin concert (violin only) score. Unhappily,I load it under Glazounov!

it would be great, in the case this score is not rejected, to move it under Glodmark!

best regards.

No problem. I will move it to the correct place. Thanks for letting us know. Carolus 12:56, 22 May 2009 (EDT)

Bartok: 2 Portraits

Hello J.p.m.

Is this your own typeset of the violin solo part for the first portrait? Please let us know as soon as possible as we normally delete new typesets where there is no apparent attribution or permission from the creator in 24 hours or less. Thanks, Carolus 06:57, 21 February 2010 (UTC) (IMSLP Copyright Admin)

YES. I enter myself this missing score and, from my side, you are fully allowed to introduce it in the site in order to propose a compete set regarding this Bartok's work.

For information : I used 'MuseScore 9.5' software to create this score and PrimoPDF to pint it in PDF file format

Niccolò Paganini

Hi J.p.m., much as I would love IMSLP to have a score of the 3rd concerto in E, the 1991 edition by Boccaccini & Spada isn’t anywhere near PD – the piano reduction is credited to Francesco Fiore; the violin part has ample revisions by Vicenzo Bolognese. This wouldn’t even qualify under the EU laws regarding urtexts (scientific editions) as it is only 20 years old. Cheers, Philip @ © talk 14:29, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
IMSLP Copyright Review team


Copyright Violation: Vissarion Shebalin
Red copyright.png

Please DO NOT add works by Vissarion Shebalin.
Reason: Under copyright worldwide. Carolus 00:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC) (IMSLP Copyright Admin)

Please visit this page to familiarise yourself with the restrictions on uploads to this website.

{{Template:CopyVio | composer name | reason}}


Hi J.p.m. If I judge 'Ricci' and 'Kremer' to refer to Ruggiero Ricci and Gidon Kremer respectively, then the recordings you uploaded are under copyright worldwide and therefore had to be deleted. Please be more careful about checking the copyright status of files you're planning on uploading in the future. Thanks, KGill talk email 15:40, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Violin Concerto by Stravinsky

Hi J.p.m,
the violin concerto is under copyright worldwide (see here) and had to be deleted. Hobbypianist 20:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Moved from user page

heey! can you send the this flute sonata to my e-mail please! i would really appreciate it :D thanks you..

Dear Rugii, I have removed your e-mail address as we do not encourage file sharing. Thanks, Lndlewis10 02:35, 5 July 2011 (UTC)