Talk:Breitkopf und Härtel



eh what does the greek text do in here? --Funper talk 09:37, 24 June 2007 (EDT)

It is because apparently the iflang parser function has to be used inside the heading and not over it, or else the contents won't generate correctly... --Feldmahler 09:42, 24 June 2007 (EDT)
I'll notify our greek friend that he'd better change all his work :) If iflang is used inside the heading, it works fine. Peter talk 10:25, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
It's all greek to me. (I just had to.) --Funper 01:57, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

LISZT - Franz Liszt's Musikalische Werke. Herausgegeben von der Franz Liszt-Stiftung (Entirely on IMSLP)

If this were facebook, I'd so "like" this. --Funper 22:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

C.V. 5

I have a publication printed in 1880 of Chopin's Polonaise, Op.44, but the plate number reads C.V. 5, which doesn't match any of the Breitkopf und Hartel plate numbers. Any ideas on where it would have come from?

Regular issues: Edition Breitkopf (1913-present)

1913? Should this read 1813? ... Eric 02:54, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Sch. Ed. 5

Does anyone know if "Sch. Ed. #" is a plate number system for Breitkopf and Hartel? The piece is by Xaver Scharwenka, so maybe it means Scharwenka Edition. Any ideas? Jefflyon 22:44, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Dating of B&H plate 9616

The B&H Catalog from 1847 lists and prices Heller's Rondoletto sur la Cracovienne, Op.12. Unless plate 9616 represents a new engraving (unlikely), the inferred date of 1858 for it appears incorrect.

Well, have you checked HMB (searching for Rondoletto 12)? It appears (relevantly) in 1839 and then "Nouv. Edit ." in their June 1858 issue. So not unlikely at all- true, in fact. Eric 13:13, 16 May 2011 (UTC)


I will convert this to CSW tomorrow, and also fix the small mistakes I made. Respectfully, Emery 07:33, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Excellent, thanks!-- Snailey (_@/) Talk to Me Email me 15:40, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

No problem - it needed to be done at some point! What else do I need to do to complete the cleanup? Emery 01:07, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Should be enough to remove the template.-- Snailey (_@/) Talk to Me Email me 01:24, 9 August 2011 (UTC)