Dear Fynnjamin, Are you the heir of Walter Braithwaite, or do have written permission from the heirs to post his work here? If not, or if we don't get a response from you very soon, the item you posted will be deleted for copyright violation as his work is not public domain in Canada (or anywhere else). Thanks, Carolus 17:53, 19 May 2009 (EDT) (IMSLP Copyright Admin)
Hello,
Walter Braithwaite was my great-grandfather, and I own his manuscripts.
I own the copyright to his work, and want to share it with a wider audience.
Regards,
Fynn Titford-Mock
22:05 GMT, 1 June 2009
That's fine, I understand! Not used to this great site yet.
More music to come! Fynn
Hello Fynnjamin, There's no need to delete the page itself. You can simply replace the present file with a new, improved one by clicking on the file-number link, which will take you to the image-page (a page for managing the file itself). From there, just use the "replace file" feature. Thanks, Carolus 16:24, 17 June 2009 (EDT)
I noticed the errors that the Sibley uploader was spitting out when you tried to use it, and I've corrected the problem. It should work as intended now. Sorry for the inconvenience! --Feldmahler 15:08, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I removed some empty work pages, as we usually do not host pages without scores on them. If you wish to upload scores to those pages, just drop me a note on my talk page and I will restore the pages. Thank you. --Leonard Vertighel 13:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Dear Fynnjamin, in some of your recent uploads (here, here and here) the Microsoft logo is present on each page. Before we can release the scores the logos must be removed. If possible please replace the files with cleaned versions. Thanks and Regards, Hobbypianist 17:51, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello Fynnjamin, Thanks for uploading so many nice items from this important collection. As a little courtesy to them (they've never complained even a little), please include the link in the scanner field. Just use this: [http://www.kb.dk/da/nb/samling/ma/digmus/index.html Det Kongelige Bibliotek]. Thanks, Carolus 23:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
I've just uploaded a load of Telemann from SLUB Dresden, but listed it as from Det Kongelige Bibliotek. Bother. I'll sort it out when I can.
Dear Fynnjamin. Thanks for your latest scores from the Dresden Library. Could I ask you to include the following information on future uploads where possible: 1) the number of pages in each PDF file; 2) the publisher and date as shown on the site; 3) the correct URL of the page on the Dresden Library site. Otherwise the copyright reviewers have to chase around finding and checking this information, which can leave the file blocked for longer than it needs to be. Thanks — P.davydov 22:28, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
apologies, I will be more careful with future uploads, and I'll try and correct what I've submitted so far. Sorry. Fynn. 10:08, 19 October 2009
Hi Fynnjamin. It's not a good idea to put ampersands (&) in file names, and this has caused the file you just uploaded to become separated from its work page. The only solution is to delete both the faulty page and the file that's become detached (which as an administrator I've been able to do for you). You might like to create another workpage for "Concerto for 2 Flutes and 2 Oboes in G major (Fasch, Johann Friedrich)" and try uploading the file again. Sorry for the inconvenience — P.davydov 15:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
OK, I apologise I hadn't realised that.
You kindly started a composer page for him. He is actually one and the same as the composer detailed in: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Schl%C3%B6sser
The confusion arises because he was often known by the French equivalent of his first name. I tried to update the info myself, but am not enough of an expert on the wiki grammar!
Hi. I'm pretty sure that Pestalozzi is actually this guy, considering that the profile (composer) is a closer match, the work was first published in 1922, and the title page just says 'Heinrich', not 'Johann Heinrich'. They're both Swiss, however. So I guess Sibley just messed up. Cheers, KGill talk email 19:41, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi, as he died less than 50 years ago, his music still can't be allowed on the site (not PD in Canada until 2012). Sorry... KGill talk email 16:54, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Yep just realised. bother.
Hi, and thanks for all these great uploads! I've been changing the link in the Scanner field to the SLUB template (I think this is what you were trying to do); you can do this yourself by putting {{SLUB}} (including curly braces) for the scanner when you submit the file. Cheers, KGill talk email 01:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
About the Bruni trios, you note (I think) that the viola part is absent - is there evidence one was ever written? I recall that for many if not most string trios before Mozart's (Vaclav Pichl's being one exception) two violins and bass was the norm, violas not being part of the normal instrumentation of a string trio at the time. Though no date is provided for the Bruni trios, so I don't know that they were written before Pichl's, either? :) Eric 03:15, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
There's already an article for that work... :) String_Quintet_No.1,_Op.85_(Stanford,_Charles_Villiers) Eric 01:38, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Great job! Could you please credit the scanner (yourself?)? Thanks.-- Snailey (_@/) Talk to Me Email me 22:08, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
I notice that when you upload works, you generally write "Opus #". According to our general information guide, it's best to write "Op.#" (with no space of course). Really small nit-picky thing, but since you're a regular uploader, it's best that you are aware of both the guide and the rule. I must commend you on your instrumentation, though. You follow the formatting almost perfectly. Thanks, BKhon 19:32, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
You can link to pages within IMSLP by using double brackets ("[[ ]]") instead of externally linking using single ("[ ]") brackets. Cheers-- Snailey (_@/) Talk to Me Email me 21:03, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello Fynnjamin, Are these actually 2 pages from the collection Harmonia Perfecta? If so, go ahead and use the format I inserted into the publisher field (collection title in italics on top line, followed by usual publisher citation below) for cases like these. Of course, if you've already uploaded the collection previously, you can link to as described by Perlnerd above. Thanks, as usual, for all of the interesting historic uploads! Carolus 22:18, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Dear Fynnjamin. You inadvertently caused a problem when you changed the tag on this work recently, which meant that it was removed from the categorization system. If you believe that a work is incorrectly tagged then please contact a member of the tagging team, as they alone are authorised to change the tags. Thanks — P.davydov 05:48, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Fynnjamin. I see that you are doing quite a bit of work adding page numbers in the work fields. Unless the automatic page counter (which was recently installed) is incorrect, I wouldn't worry too much about meticulously adding them :-) BKhon 12:36, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Fabulous! Nice work-- Snailey (_@/) Talk to Me Email me 04:00, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Thank you! Does Grove have this summary worklist? I have no access. http://etd.library.miami.edu/theses/available/etd-07282009-105611/unrestricted/sspearsS209.pdf (Thank you, Mr. Spears):
"Table 1.1. Music publications by Michael Praetorius
Title of publication ---- Volume in collected works[7]
[7] Michael Praetorius, Gesamtausgabe der musikalischen Werke von Michael Praetorius, 21 vols.,
ed. Friedrich Blume (Wolfenbüttel: Kallmeyer, 1928-56)."
With more than 1200 works in the Musae Sioniae alone, a detailed listing here would be a major contribution! Olmsted 04:27, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
An excellent starting point can be found at http://www.worldcat.org/title/gesamtausgabe-der-musikalischen-werke/oclc/3577784 (scroll down to the bottom of the page). The page numbers or chapter/piece numbers are not listed, however.
See also http://www.medieval.org/emfaq/composers/terpsichore.html. Olmsted 16:41, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Good catch re opus 1 - I think I had remembered unusually there being only one work in the set (not so unusually in 1798-1800, ok... between a page that was then visible - not anymore I think - in Wyn Jones' book on Beethoven's Vienna in Google Books, and also de-Wikipedia) but was mistaken. There are several Gleissner opus 1 sets, annoyingly, but the others seem to not be symphonies (choral works, mostly), fortunately :). Some of his music has in fact been recorded, apparently (a symphony and a piano concerto, at the least, noticed it on amazon.com), by the way. Anyhow, thanks! Eric 14:46, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
I've put a load of Faure songs in from Sibley, but in the wrong place, i.e. by making a separate page for each, rather than adding to the Song Opp. pages. darn.
Hi Fynnjamin. Just to let you know that he's been moved to Vranken, Peter Johannes Joseph in accordance with our naming guidelines (I decided to go with the German form of the name). Cheers, KGill talk email 01:16, 18 January 2011 (UTC)]
cheers! --Fynnjamin 11:18, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
In noting the instrumentation of Messe solennelle, Op.19 (Marzo, Eduardo), you wrote "SATB soli, SATB chorus". The score clearly shows a piano or organ part as early as page 1 ??? Eric 02:08, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Nope, wasn't me. I think I just put SATB voices, organ. Someone else edited it. --Fynnjamin 11:18, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Oh- I really need to read page histories more. Many apologies! Eric 13:05, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Fynnjamin. Just to let you know that he's been moved to Cartellieri, Casimir Anton in accordance with IMSLP's naming guidelines. Cheers, KGill talk email 02:15, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Fynnjamin. Just to let you know that he's been moved to Hartmann, P. in accordance with our naming guidelines. Cheers, KGill talk email 01:39, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
"Per questo dolce amplesso" is from Artaserse as well, cf., e.g., here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-Jw9qy_Dn4 --BoccaccioTalk Email 14:31, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Great find at DKB for the early Haydn parts issued by Hummel and Sieber - and the actual first edition of Schoepfung! Carolus 23:53, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Fynnjamin,
This one sort of amazes me. Apparently, the arranger of the Beethoven Turkish March you uploaded from DKB is Alexander Borovsky (1889-1968). As this is clearly an arrangement or adaptation, it would not be free in either the USA (published 1947 with a valid notice), Canada or the EU. Nevertheless, DKB has it available for download! I'm going to tag this N/N/N for now and will e-mail the person at DKB who has been so kind in helping us obtain the Nielsen critical edition. Carolus 06:41, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Fynnjamin. Please don't modify the 'tags' section of a workpage, as that is reserved for designated members of the categorization project team (who have all had to read a very long manual). If you're considering joining the team, Davydov is the person to ask about it. Thanks, KGill talk email 12:18, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Fynnjamin. While doing copyright tagging I noticed that the file you uploaded to that page is in fact an exact duplicate of the one you uploaded to Fantaisie et Sonate, Op.4 (Hässler, Johann Wilhelm). Thanks, KGill talk email 17:10, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Fynnjamin. Thanks for your email, and we could do with extra help at the moment, so welcome to the team! If there's anything you're uncertain about then don't hesitate to ask on the project discussion page — P.davydov 19:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Please be careful when tagging to make sure you include the work type and the instrumentation (and language for vocal works). You missed the instrumentation on this piece — P.davydov 21:13, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, please have a look at I'm trying to set up here: IMSLP:Community_Projects/DKB_Project. Cheers − Pierre.chepelov 21:35, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi − IMHO it is not a manuscript because: 1. there are marks of the plate being pressed on the paper, especially on the upper corner of the cover page ; 2. it looks very similar to other self-engraved Telemann scores ; 3. there are a few added numbers that are indeed manuscript and look very different from the regular ones, e.g. 6th system, p.11 of the "vocal score" (strocked 7 / 2, 5 / 2). What do you think? Cheers Pierre.chepelov 08:10, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Yes - check other Balthasar Schmid publications (e.g. Goldberg Variations) - the style looks so similar, it must be the same. And yes there do seem to be a couple of figures added in MS - again, a colour facsimile would show this better. --Fynnjamin 09:44, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
why is Quartet for Bassoon and Strings, Op.43, by Georg Abraham Schneider being left as is?... Eric
hmm second thoughts... maybe just undo my moves if you don't like it, I don't mind --Fynnjamin 08:53, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi Fynnjamin. Do you know whether the Highland Music Trust has explicitly given permission for their engravings to be distributed freely? I couldn't find anything specific about that on their site, though I may have been missing something. Thanks, KGill talk email 23:56, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi Fynnjamin, thanks for the correction! Indeed: "Peface" is not a good omen for a translation...--Ralph Theo Misch 21:05, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This field is now being 'read' by the system (a feature which is increasing as we interface with iPad apps, etc.), I understand that we should be entering this info in the following format: YYYY-MM-DD. Since you're such a major contributor, I thought you might like to know. Carolus 19:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
It would appear that LOC agrees. He must have either composed it while in Germany or with the German text in mind. Thanks! Carolus 01:44, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Fynnjamin, I'm just checking some tagging. Does your source score say "anthem" anywhere on it? If it doesn't, I'd like to re-tag it "sacred choruses", because that is what is used as a generic if there is nothing taggable in the title. Thanks, Steltz 17:01, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Dear Composer or Copyright Owner,
s a composer or other copyright holder, please take time to carefully review the Creative Commons and licensing policies and guidelines.
For those uploading the first time, please remember choose the menu option "New Composition" when uploading your original works (even if they are scans of manuscripts or printouts), "New Arrangement" when uploading new arrangements, and "New Edition" when uploading new editions of public domain works. As it is normally assumed that composers and arrangers have edited their own work, please leave the "Editor" field empty unless another person has actually edited your work (in which case their name should be inserted). Note also that the English term "Editor" is not the equivalent of the French editeur or Italian editore. "Editor" refers to the person who reviewed and corrected the piece, while the French and Italian words are closer to the English word "publisher". In the "Publisher" field, please use your own full legal name, as making your scores and sound files available for free download on this site constitutes "publication" under the laws of most countries in the world. (Note that this is done automatically when using the standard upload tools).
You should be aware that Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 allows for the unrestricted copying, performance (live and broadcast) and recording of the work (including explicitly commercial use) at no charge, with no compensation or royalties payable to the composer or copyright owner for such commercial exploitation. Note also that the all of the acceptable licenses are considered to be IRREVOCABLE once a file has been uploaded with the lawful copyright owner's authorization.
You are free to change the license after upload to something more suitable. IMSLP as a matter of policy will list files under the most permissive licensing terms. Since licenses and public domain dedications are irrevocable, restrictions cannot be added later, but a more liberal license can be selected. Composers are also encouraged to make use of our new template {{NoPerf}}, which automatically places works into a new category - Unperformed Works. To add this template to your pages, simply copy and paste the little template above (curly brackets and all) into the "First Performance" field of the "General Information" section on all work pages.
Before you upload, remember these key points...
PS: For additional and more detailed explanation, please visit our Composer Portal page.
I can take them down if you like. I would recommend using the Performance Restricted if you are member of a society like PRS or ASCAP. Otherwise, the non-commercial is useful for keeping the Ebay crazies at bay - so to speak (the folks who rip this site and sell CDs and DVDs of "All the World's Greatest Music Sheets for <instrument>" and the like - which has included works of living composers copied from here in the past (until I made some complaints to Ebay about the issue). Carolus 23:39, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
OK, I've taken them all down. I expect PRS will regard all of the CC licenses as ASCAP has in my discussions with them - toxic in a word. What the performance restrictions mean (for the USA - I am not that well-versed on how it works in the UK but expect its quite similar) is that anyone performing your work apart from some very narrow legally-specified exemptions (benefit performances in which everyone involved donates their services, for example) must obtain a license in order to perform the work either live or via broadcast. Most organizations - even non-professional ones - have what is referred to as a "blanket license" for this purpose, which is typically a yearly payment to PRS, ASCAP or a similar agency. The performing organization has to send copies of their programs every year and PRS then pays its members accordingly. For your editions, another thing to keep in mind is that the plain-vanilla Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 has no sort of restriction on commercial use. Thus, if anyone wanted to make copies of your files and sell them on Ebay, they would be perfectly free to do so. If this is not OK with you, I would recommend using the non-commercial version. That means you have to replace your files of course, since you diligently placed the Creative Commons notice on the first page of the items I looked at. Your engraving is very fine, BTW. You should join in on the discussion over at the forum about prospective standards for new typesets. Carolus 06:33, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Re Gerson, it seems he did publish one string quartet, but I can't seem to work out its key from here at the moment- any idea and any idea if it's one of the 5 manuscript ones? Also, I'm surprised they posted the symphony as it seems to have been published (in that big Garland Publishing series, the symphony in ... ...) in the 1980s (I recall seeing it and the overture on a recent CD I think so hope that there are other factors that do allow us to have it here though. I've heard other items I think were on that CD iirc- Kunzen's G minor symphony, JPE Hartmann's later G minor no.1 - and may have heard Gerson's also... anyhow- thanks much!! and always good to have 5 more quartets to read and for others to play :) ) Eric 00:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
I'm wondering if I ought to give all the pieces their Gerson catalgue number, e.g. 'G.68' - there are several pieces with the same title which would be better distinguished that way. --Fynnjamin 06:49, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Dear Fynnjamin: I've changed the tag on this -- lieder isn't mentioned in the title, and the "aus" designation makes it seem as if it's from something larger anyway. It should just be "duets" for now, and if it turns out that there is a larger work called Claudina von Villa, the page will need to be changed to reflect that. Thanks. Steltz 06:39, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
I think Sibley has it very wrong and really should correct what they have at 1802/14842 - the trios for strings "oeuvre 2me" dedicated to Pugnani, according anyway to the interesting and hopefully fairly reliable worklist at the Italian Viotti Wikipedia page, are actually W. III 1 to 6, not 19 to 24 :) (they give the key sequence there, and it matches those of the trios in the file at Sibley, too, for confirmation.) Eric 23:46, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Dear Fynnjamin: when you tag symphonic music, please don't tag the individual wind instruments (e.g. Dittersdorf Symphony in C). We only do this when the wind instruments are solo instruments, for example a concerto. The correct tag for this was "orch bc". Thanks, Steltz 07:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Dear Fynnjamin: just to let you know that I added an "hpd" tag to this, because the string parts are ad lib, so the sonatas can also be done by harpsichord solo. Steltz 08:56, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Dear Fynnjamin: just to let you know that I added a "bc" tag to this -- when we tag orchestral works that have continuo, the tag is "orch bc", although this doesn't apply to modern keyboard parts within orchestral works, just proper continuo parts. Steltz 13:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
My understanding (which could be mistaken) was that all of the waltzes and other dances were originally for orchestra even if they were first published as piano arrangements. Since he was a popular orchestral leader of the day (like his sons), things were normally premiered by the Strauss orchestra under his baton. It's all very difficult to discern exactly of course as the orchestra and piano versions were frequently done at the same time. Carolus 00:56, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
I've been using "Full Scores" for the second-level hierarchy to avoid redundancy with the major page division which was re-named "Scores" from "Files" a while back. (I actually preferred the less-specific "Scores" myself, to tell you the truth). Love the RISM links, BTW. Since I'm doing lots of templates lately, perhaps I look over there and see if I can make one for RISM as well. I'm also starting to think we need to add another optional field for "Engraver/Scribe" to the file template as there seem to be a fair number of these folks appearing the editor field lately, another optional "External Links" field might be a good place to add your RISM links. Carolus 04:33, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Fynnjamin, I noticed that you continued uploading a lot of interesting scores from SLUB recently. Did you find a systematic way to work through their repertoire? Or did you find a list of newly uploaded scores (there still seems to be nor rss feed like on the old page)? --BoccaccioTalk Email 09:23, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
I asked via their support form if they plan to reintroduce RSS. After more than a week, I finally got a reply: They have it as a top priority on their agenda and it should be available within 4 weeks. --BoccaccioTalk Email 15:41, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
RSS feeds now up and running on SLUB website! Huzzah! --Fynnjamin 16:55, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I just changed the attribution of the Huldigungs-Marsch, from Johann Gottfried Herder (the famous poet) to Johann Jakob Gottfried von Herder (the later's grandson), and also changed the estimated publication date from ca.1790 to ca.1850, following the HAAB, because:
Just say, if you don't mind... Cheers. Pierre Ch. 12:35, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi Fynn,
Just a couple things to keep in mind:
Thanks, KGill talk email 21:32, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
I can't tell for sure but was {{AAB}} what was meant? Best! Eric 13:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC) Oh- ok, you did mean HAAB I'm guessing ? - but I don't think we have a template for it yet? (or maybe with different capitalization? hrm. it's not in Category:External library templates, at least... I don't know what it stands for though... one's always learning on this site, or can. all to the good I say...
Re Reinsdorp etc. the best I can seem to find about them just this moment is this Google book brief info - Musik und Migration in Ostmitteleuropa (2005 book, page 403, preview). Active turn of the 19th century, first publisher went by H. Reinsdorp/Rejnsdorp, started in 1787 if I'm reading the German correctly, not sure but the notation in the book may mean that Kaestner joined around 1800 or so, and that the operation lasted until 1812. The book seems pretty sure (though other references from earlier dates are not) that they were indeed based in Moscow. Their source overall is Muzycuk1999. Eric 00:28, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Fynnjamin, just need to let you know that I re-tagged both of these. Variations never get tagged by the type of theme used (it can't really be played separately anyway), so I removed the romances tag. I think the confusion is coming because the subtitle lists the word "Romance" first. However, the "variée" at the end of the line is the deciding factor, and it took me a while to work this out when I started tagging, but it's more a problem of grammatical construction. A "Romance variée" is a "varied Romance", which isn't strictly a Romance, it's a set of variations on the Romance. It's just that with all the explanation in the middle as to where the Romance is from, these titles have to be read as "Romance (from blah-dee-blahh) varied". Thanks, Steltz 08:15, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
This one needed to be re-tagged as well. Although piano is listed first in the title, the phrase "avec accompagnement d'un Violin obligé" indicates that the violin part is obligatory, i.e. this will never be performed as a piano solo work. Thanks, Steltz 08:22, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Uoh, we must have downloaded these at almost the same time. Someone will have to delete one of these two workpages. But, do you have any evidence for Op.10??, The linked list of works has them as Op.8, as has the Hayes Oboe Bibliography--Kalliwoda 09:21, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
SLUB emailed me, that this has been withdrawn for technical revisions to the scan--Kalliwoda 15:43, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Hallo, laut RISM stammen die beiden Stücke aus der SLUB nicht von Antonin Jiranek, sondern von Frantisek Jiranek.
RISM: Ergebnisse 1–2 von insgesamt 2 für Freie Suche = jiranek (0,14 Sekunden) Jiránek, František Symphonies - C-Dur; strings, bc, ob (3); Abschrift; etc; D-Dl; Mus.4076-N-1 Jiránek, František Concertos - d-Moll; vl, strings, bc; Abschrift; D-Dl; Mus.4076-O-1
Sollte man eine neue Composerseite einrichten und die beiden Kompositionen dahin verschieben? Notenschreiber 05:51, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Fynnjamin,
May I suggest that the tagging team review their application of the term concertante - It seems just complete nonsense to tag a work as "concertante" just because one of three original prints uses it as was common practice in Paris around 1790-1810 to add this term to almost any duo, trio, quartet or quintet if it was not an instructional work. The Vanhal quartets have nothing in common with a Sinfonia concertante or the virtuosic Duo concertante of an Ignaz Moscheles for Violin and Piano. http://imslpforums.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=5238
Same with grand by the way... - or would you prefer to rename the Beethoven Septet as "Grand Septuor" and the Wind octet as "Grand Octuor". Of cause, there are a few exceptions where the established modern name includes the word, but this should not be the general rule. The Piano Trio version (Op.38) of the Septet is a nice example of my argument above, because in its only french print by Pleyel it had the title "Grand Trio concertant - surely this would not warrant the classification as a "Concertante" that just happens to be a Piano Trio. --Kalliwoda 11:27, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Dear Fynnjamin: I noticed you tagged these "orch". Only string parts are uploaded. Is there anything else involved? I listened to some samples of the Heinsius from recordings on Arkiv, and I can only hear strings and continuo. If there is no evidence for wind/timpani, these has to be retagged. Thanks, Steltz 19:16, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
He was still alive (making recording) in 1976. So, the arrangement you just uploaded has to be moved to the USA server, as it's not free in Canada. It will be blocked until then. Carolus 06:16, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello Fynnjamin
While adding my new modern edition of Gerson's Capric[c]io for violin and orchestra to IMSLP I noticed that you've included Gerson catalog numbers into the work page titles. I wonder who prepared this catalog. There is no reference to a catalog in the Grove article on the composer nor in the most recent edition of "Dansk biografisk leksikon", now on line accessible as part of "Den store danske encyklopædi" (http://www.denstoredanske.dk/Dansk_Biografisk_Leksikon/Samfund,_jura_og_politik/Økonomi/Bankier/Georg_Gerson).
The catalog numbers are not the same as those in the "Verzeichnis". Did you prepare the catalog yourself? Please consider adding a reference to the catalog.
BTW - Jens Egeberg, responsible for Royal Library's music digitizing, appreciates your upload of its facsimiles to IMSLP:-)
--Reccmo 09:35, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Ha! No worries! --Fynnjamin 19:41, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi! I just played through the 2 Buxtehude keyboard suites that you transcribed--thanks so much for doing that!! Buxtehude is my favorite composer, and I love playing his music. Do you know of any other sources for his music, especially the keyboard suites, arias, variations, etc? I can't seem to find anywhere where I can buy them. I assume most of them are still in manuscript? Maybe you would be willing to transcribe some more tablature if I bought some facsimiles?? Keep up the good work! A lot of interesting scores that I download here have your name next to the file :) Andrewt 06:06, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Fynnjamin! Thanks for all the hymnals and tune books from the Internet Archive. It's a great resource that does a good job of hiding what they have! I wasn't sure if you were aware of this or not but we have a template for the Internet Archive to go in the scanner field. The usage is {{IArch|the text after "details" in the url}}. This will not only link to the exact item on archive.org but will also place the item in Category: Scores from the Internet Archive. Thanks! --Cypressdome 01:16, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
"Scores" is redundant, since the level 2 division is already labeled "Scores". I wasn't totally pleased with the change of the level 2 header to "Scores" as the term was useful for the left-most tab in many cases, but the reasons in favor of it being level 2 outweigh the reasons against. Also, it's somewhat nonsensical to have parts and scores assigned to separate tabs with chamber music, especially when there are only two or three separate parts. The tab division is better suited for items where there are at least 4 or 5 different parts, best of all for orchestral and opera parts. Thanks, Carolus 04:17, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Fynjjamin. I noticed in a few places such as Category:Funk, Joseph you've changed "Nationality=American" to "Nationality=American composers", for example. In fact only the first word is recognised by the system, and "composers" is ignored completely, so it won't make any difference at all. Not worth wasting your time on :-) — P.davydov 12:50, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Hrm. I'd suggest Seydler, Philip except that you have him or her dying in 1830, and Philip Seydler, a flutist (same instrument as for the one piece you have under P Seydler), lived from 1764 to 1819. I assume the 1830 is a date and not a circa, since that's how you have it written, but what's your source for it please? Eric 03:36, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
I'll change it then- thanks. Eric 09:30, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Since you seem to be a major contributor of collections here, I thought you might like to know of a couple of new related features:
Best Wishes, Carolus 06:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
http://imslp.org/wiki/24_Sonatas_(Bertouch,_Georg_von)
Please note that Bertouch's collection of sonatas was first published, not in 1738, but in 2006. There are three exceptions: Sonata No. 9 (first published by Bjarne Volle in 1980); Sonata No. 18 (first published by Magne Elvestrand in 1977); Sonata No. 23 (first published by Bjarne Volle in 1992). See
https://www.areditions.com/rr/rrb/b144.html
The information given at IMSLP:Copyright Made Simple would seem to indicate that this music is not in the public domain. However, I am not a lawyer, and I may be wrong. Nevertheless, I will ask A-R Editions for an opinion. Crayon 01:34, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
if the Wikipedia link you've provided gives the Nationality, please add it to the new composer page you've created? thanks :) Eric 09:04, 16 March 2012 (EDT)
